ABOUT THIS CONTENTA checklist for using the McKinsey 7-S framework to describe a business.
Here is a checklist for using the McKinsey 7-S Framework to describe a business. Note that the 7-S model was developed in the 1980’s by Robert Waterman, Tom Peters and Julien Philips while working for McKinsey and originally presented in their article “Structure is not Organization.” Also included are questions to help evaluate industry structure.
- In what kinds of markets does the business compete and how are these markets changing?
- Types of Customers
- Local Market
- Regional Market
- Global Market
- Technical Leadership
- Quality and Reliability
- Knowledge of the Market
- Control of Distribution Channels
- Monopoly Power through Government Policy
- Artificially Protected Market
- Government Connections
- Product Design
- Distribution and Selling
- Service, Selling or other Distinctive Capabilities
- Market Position
- Protect Existing Market Share
- Penetrate New Markets
- Enhance Value to Customers by Lowering Production Cost, Improve Product/Service or Greater Technology Edge
- Acquire or Move Into New Business or Technology
- Change the Game
- Distributors and Retailers
- Suppliers of Funds
- Suppliers of Materials and Equipment
- Key Governmental Bodies
- How is the company/team divided?
- What is the hierarchy?
- How do the various departments coordinate activities?
- How do the team members organize and align themselves?
- Is decision making and controlling centralized or decentralized? Is this as it should be, given what we’re doing?
- Where are the lines of communication? Explicit and implicit?
- What business activities that are crucial to its successes is the firm good at performing and how are these changing?
- What business activities that are crucial to its success is the firm weak in performing and how are these changing?
- What important management activities must the company perform much better than it does now?
- Business System Functions
- Nonbusiness System Functions
- Employee Relations
- Staff Development
- Government Relations
- Special Management Challenges
- Multi-Product Line Management
- Acquisition Management
- Resource Deployment
- Action and Execution Focus
- Close to the Customer
- Productivity Through People Focus
- Simple Form, Lean Staff
- Stick to their Knitting
- Hands-on, Value-Driven
- Simultaneous Loose-Tight Properties
- How do people in the firm describe the ways in which it is distinctive?
- How do people in the firm describe what is key about “how we do things around here?”
- Controlling Considerations in Decision Making
- Impact of Priority Customers
- Internal Political Considerations
- Financial Attractiveness
- Impact on Market Position
- Donor or Government Requirements or Expectations
- How Important Constituencies are Dealt with
- How Things get done
- How decisions are made
- What preoccupies senior management
- Business Functions
- Markets and product Lines
- Organizational Units
- Cost Versus Value to Customer
- Shore Versus Long Run
- Internal Versus External
And does the guiding concept fit with the strategy and skills of the firm?
- What are the most important management processes that top management uses to run this firm?
- Annual Strategy and/or Performance Review
- Monthly or Quarterly Operating Reviews
- Capital Investment Approvals
- “Kitchen-Cabinet Sessions”
- “Management by Walking Around”
- Formal versus Informal
- Financial versus Substantive
- Staff versus Line-Dominated
- Multilateral versus Bilateral
- Path Setting
- Problem Finding
- Decision Making
- What is top management’s apparent view of its own principal value-add?
- Monitor, review and ensure results
- Make sure others answer tough questions before they make decisions
- Make tough decisions directly
- Stay on top of internal operations
- Identify issues for attention
- Relate with outside world
- Maintain internal conditions for effective function
- Chart course and set direction
- Recent decisions
- More or less formal pronouncements
- Informal questioning routines
- Praise and promotion or criticism
- Wide consultation versus narrow consultation versus solitary decision making
- Reliance on data and analysis versus trusted counsel versus lessons of experience
- Compensations and perquisites
- Personal relations
- Participation and team spirit
- Internal competition
- What are the demographics of the management group and how are they changing?
- Functional and business unit experience within the company
- Educational background/professional discipline
- Experience outside the company
- Religion, political party, age, sex, regional factions
- Important accomplishments
- Interests and personal crusades
- Emphasis on development planning, performance appraisal, training, etc.
- One man versus CEO/COO versus team
- Collective executive versus collection of top managers of various organizational units
- Government representation or oversight
- Board as review versus deliberative versus directive body
- Task Forces
- Full time versus part time
- Volunteers versus draftees
- Reports versus results
- Project managers
- Quality circles
- Management “panels” or “boards”
- Distribution and sales
- Materials supply, subassembly, etc.
- Technology supply
Evaluating Industry Structure
Threat of New Entrants
- Do large firms have a cost or performance advantage in your segment of the industry?
- Are there any proprietary product differences in your industry?
- Are there any established brand identities in your industry?
- Do your customers incur any significant costs in switching suppliers?
- Is a lot of capital needed to enter your industry?
- Is serviceable used equipment expensive?
- Does the newcomer to your industry face difficulty in accessing distribution channels?
- Does experience help you to continuously lower costs?
- Does the newcomer have any problems in obtaining the necessary skilled people, materials or suppliers?
- Does your product or service have any proprietary features which give you lower costs?
- Are there any licenses, insurance or qualifications which are difficult to obtain?
- Can the newcomer expect strong retaliation on entering the market?
High barriers to entry = + factors (favorable to industry)
Low barriers to entry = – factors (unfavorable to industry)
Threat of Substitutes
(Some other product or service which performs the same jobs as yours)
- Substitutes have performance limitation which do not completely offset their lowest price or their performance advantage is not justified by their higher price.
- The customer will incur costs in switching to a substitute.
- Your customer has no real substitute.
- Your customer is not likely to substitute
Low threat of substitution = + factors (favorable to industry)
High threat of substitution factors (unfavorable to industry)
Bargaining Power of Suppliers
- My inputs (materials, labor, supplies, services, etc.) are standard rather than unique or differentiated.
- I can switch between suppliers quickly and cheaply.
- My suppliers would find it difficult to enter my business or my customers would find it difficult to perform my function in house.
- I can substitute inputs readily.
- I have many potential suppliers.
- My business is important to my suppliers.
- My cost of purchases has a significant influence on my overall costs.
Low bargaining power of suppliers = + factors (favorable to industry)
High bargaining power of suppliers = – factors (unfavorable to industry)
Determinants of Rivalry Among Existing Competitors
- The industry is growing rapidly.
- The industry is not cyclical with intermittent over-capacity.
- The fixed costs of the business are a relatively low portion of total costs.
- There are significant product differences and brand identities between the competitors.
- The competitors are diversified rather than specialized.
- It would not be hard to get out of this business because there are no specialized skills and facilities or long term contract commitments, etc.
- My customers would include significant costs in switching to a competitor.
- My product is complex and requires a detailed understand on the part of my customer.
- All my competitors are approximately my size.
Low level of rivalry = + factors (favorable to industry)
Higher level of rivalry factors (unfavorable to industry)
Overall Industry Rating
Threat of new entrants = __
Threat of substitutes = __
Bargaining power of suppliers = __
Bargaining power of buyers = __
Rivalry among the existing companies = __
Click to Add the First »